Confusion when searching for literal
Created by: sqs
From @JoshuaKGoldberg:
Trying a basic literal search for
connect pure false
and also getting zero results. See image below. Amusingly, it both says there are no results and that I've hit the result count limit.

My comments:
- I can't reproduce the issue where the
Result limit hit.
alert shows up. I just seeNo results.
But the screenshot proves it, so we should look into it. - In this case, the user wanted something like regexp
connect.*pure.*false
and (understandably but mistakenly) thought that our literal search would yield that. (That is what you'd get if you clicked the.*
icon to enable regexp search.) How can we address this confusion? If I enable regexp search, I do see results. (Note that the higher-level intent was described in https://twitter.com/acemarke/status/1416585511565725696. The user really wanted something even simpler/higher-level, and we should absolutely make that work; see #22975. But we should also clear up this intermediate confusion.)
Related PR: #20356